Daily Archives: September 13, 2010

Reflection: Finding Common Ground

Today, I have discussed many topics that are going to require negotiation. The Bush tax cuts, Israel/Palestine, standing up to big business, and Democrats coming to grips with losing power. In my last post I talked about John Boehner. While I am not a fan of Representative Boehner, I do understand the position that he is in. His party was just defeated in 2008 losing both houses of congress and the presidency. On top of all that, the party has basically been without a major leader.

That means that Mr. Boehner, who I feel like is not the strongest leader that Republicans could find, must find a way to balance two ends of the party spectrum. The rising Tea Party side and the traditional side of the GOP (the side he and Mitch McConnell represent). This is not an easy task, nor a task that anyone wants. The best way to handle the situation is to appease the new guys (the Tea Partiers) because they are the ones energizing your base.

It is easy to not like the other side, but fighting common ground within your own party can be hard. Democrats have to do the same thing with the liberal progressives and the moderates, which can be tested during debates on issues like healthcare and Wall Street reform. The basic point is to make the most out the situation and find a way to form a coalition that will govern the best. It might not be easy, but with the country in tatters it is worth a shot.

To sum up my posts today:

1. My theme was economic prosperity and negotiation
2. The Palestinian Economy is growing according to the IMF
3. People must not be afraid of big business
4. Arms sales are decreasing during the recession
5. I talked about John Boehner (last post before this one)

Thanks for reading my posts. I hoped you enjoyed them. Have a great evening!

Leave a Comment

Filed under come together, power walk, reflection

Who is John Boehner?


A man of swagger and no charisma with a bad nicotine habit is how the press seems to be describing the next possible Speaker of the House John Boehner. Some have compared him to Newt Gingrich, I would not go that far. Gingrich was a man who I felt like, though I did not agree with him on most issues, could be the man who goes the local country club, while Boehner is someone who might hang out at the local tavern after a long days work, which is how Joe Scarborough once described him.

Joking aside, it is important to understand who Boehner is. First, he is a congressman from Ohio when he took office in 1991. He is running for his 10th term in congress. His website continues to describe him this way:

John’s first two terms in the U.S. House were marked by an aggressive campaign to clean up Congress and make it more accountable to the American people. During his freshman year, Boehner and fellow members of the reform-minded “Gang of Seven” took on the House establishment and successfully closed the House Bank, uncovered “dine-and-dash” practices at the House Restaurant, and exposed drug sales and cozy cash-for-stamps deals at the House Post Office. John also adopted a personal “no earmarks” policy upon taking office in 1991, a no-pork policy he maintains to this day.

Later, John was instrumental in crafting the Contract with America, the bold 100-day agenda for the 104th Congress that nationalized the 1994 elections. One of the Contract’s cornerstones – the Congressional Accountability Act, requiring Congress to live under the same rules and regulations as the rest of the nation – bears the unmistakable imprint of his drive to reform the House. The success of John’s reform-minded agenda earned him election to the House leadership after the GOP election victories in 1994. As House GOP Conference Chairman in the 104th and 105th Congress, John was a powerful voice in the fight to force Washington to stick to the strict spending limits in the Balanced Budget Act. In September 1999, as Vice-Chairman of the House Administration Committee, John joined House leaders to announce the first-ever “clean” independent audit of the House, a reform he first called for as a member of the Gang of Seven in 1992.

Notice a few interesting things about Boehner. First, he is a career politician which means he might not work quite so well with the anti-incumbent crowd following the Tea Party. Second, he is essentially calling for some of the same reforms that he has never been able to pass most of his years in congress like a Balanced Budget Amendment, ethics investigations, lower taxes, less spending. This agenda is basically the same as it has always been.

Finally, this should be used for criticism. The last few days, some have stated that the President should not attack the “next” Speaker because he is not well known or should not be a target. This is very similar to the same rebuttal that they say for Sarah Palin when conservatives ask not to attack her. I’m sorry, but you are in the public spotlight and have been serving in congress for years you are not immune to criticism. Also, remember that this is the same man who compared Wall Street Reform to using a nuclear weapon on an ant. Ladies and Gentleman, I give you John Boehner.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Obama, power walk, Republicans

At Least Something Good Came Out of the Recession

Arm sales are a topic of discussion that is usually tip-towed around, or said in a whisper, when it comes to international agreements. Exubrent rhetoric prosyltized by those in the foreign policy community, but it does not usually translate to fruits for their labor. One thing seems to be driving down arms sales better than any treaty I have seen, and that is the recession. The New York Times reports:

The global economic recession significantly pushed down purchases of weapons last year to the lowest level since 2005, a new government study has found.

The report to Congress concluded that the value of worldwide arms deals in 2009 was $57.5 billion, a drop of 8.5 percent from 2008.

or 2009, the United States signed arms deals worth $22.6 billion — a dominating 39 percent of the worldwide market. Even so, that sales figure was down from $38.1 billion in 2008, which had been a surprising increase over the $25.7 billion in 2007 that defied sluggish economic trends.

The decrease in American weapons sales in 2009 was caused by a pause in major orders from clients in the Middle East and Asia, which had pumped up the value of contracts the year before. At the same time, there were fewer support and services contracts signed with American defense firms last year, the study said.

Arms sales are sometimes hard to track because of black market sales, but with the U.S. it is probably possible to get a good estimate. This ought to make “Professional Left” happy to some degree. As for getting rid of the Pentagon as Mr. Gibbs claims we want, the economy will probably not solve that problem.

Leave a Comment

Filed under arms, defense, power walk

Afternoon Delight: David Brooks and Mark Shields

In this video from the PBS NewsHour David Brooks and Mark Shields Discuss the Bush tax cuts and the feasibility of President Obama’s strategy of attacking John Boehner.

If it does not post from some reason see it here.

Leave a Comment

Filed under afternoon delight, power walk

Palestine’s Economic Growth

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) announced yesterday that the Palestinian economy has grown by 9% for the West Bank and by 16% in the Gaza Strip. This is exciting news for the negotiations because Israel has always made the claim that a Palestinian state is not possible unless it is economically independent and sustainable. The Wall Street Journal reported:

The report also will praise the much less talked about financial-sector reforms the Palestinian Authority has implemented, particularly in the past 12 months, including bringing the territory’s banks into line with international banking standards and establishing a modern credit-scoring system that made it easier for Palestinians to borrow money. The Palestinian Authority has streamlined public payrolls and reduced spending on subsidies, allowing it to decrease dependence on foreign aid—from Europe, the U.S. and Arab countries—from $1.8 billion in 2008 to $1.2 billion in 2010.

Israeli officials say they will continue to facilitate Palestinian economic growth as long as security remains stable. But they also have made it clear that in Gaza unlimited economic growth isn’t the goal. The restrictions are aimed in part at maintaining pressure on Hamas, the militant group that controls the territory and remains hostile to Israel.

The main problem is that Israel is able to control pretty much everything that goes through the Occupied Territories. That includes food, weapons, and even the people who can enter and exit. Israel has always claimed “security interests” as its reason for having a tight control over the Palestinian livelihood, which might be accurate to some degree. I would say that unless Israel loosens its grip on what it considers to be its problem child, the negotiations will never go anywhere or work in practical terms.

Leave a Comment

Filed under foreign policy, Israel/Palestine, power walk