I have talked about numerous issues today that requires the U.S. to reshift its focus in how it views policy. DADT was something that the Democrats really wanted, but were unable to achieve because they moved to fast. As Sarah Palin would say they should “reload” for next time. The midterm election make it difficult for Democrats to make the crucial decisions about where and how to focus the debate.
Big breakthroughs are very difficult legislatively, usually always around election time. It would be smart to small election initiatives that Democrats can brag about for November that are not that controversial. The stove project for developing countries is one good example. Maybe even passing minor immigration reform could be another topic to tackle. Overall, I would say that sometimes legislative leaders focus too much on specific ideas like making China change its currency policy, when the benefits of that might be limited. The same is true on policy. Going big in politics is not always better, being small can sometimes go a long way.
To sum up my posts:
1. My theme was refocusing the debate
2. DADT was a big topic
3. One columnist gives an idea of who will be at the Stewart/Colbert rallies
4. Moses could have parted the Red Sea
5. Brooks makes an interesting point about characterizing the debate
Thanks for following along. See you tomorrow!
