Daily Archives: February 21, 2011

Sarah Palin, Netanyahu, and Birtherism

Sarah Palin is unlikely candidate to teach Bibi Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, a lesson about leadership, but it turns out her responses to questions, specifically about birtherism, are good (bad) models to not do.  David Rothkopf writes for Foreign Policy:

When I read the Washington Post‘s story ”Palestinians Seek Recognition through South America” this morning, all I could think of was Sarah Palin. Now, some might think that is a kind of a disorder that calls for therapy more than it does another blog post. But I suspect you are probably jumping to the wrong conclusion about what I think about either issue.
In defense of my mental health (which needs all the defending it can get), one reason I thought of Palin was that as I was reading the article, she appeared on the television. She was being asked what she thought about birther claims that President Obama was not born in the United States. Without the hesitation or weasel words that have made recent statements on this subject by Michelle Bachman and John Boehner such indictments of their ability to lead, Palin said that it wasn’t an issue for her and that we ought to be talking about how to fix the economy. In this instance, she got it precisely right.
But the Palin comment and the birther debate also resonated with the story of the eight Latin American governments that in December and January recognized Palestinian statehood. representatives of the Netanyahu government including the prime minister himself apparently vigorously tried to persuade the region’s leaders not to join the almost 100 nations that have also acknowledged the legitimacy of the right of self-determination of the Palestinian people.
Once again, the issue seems like a distraction to me. The response of Israel ought to be like the response of Palin, “Of course, the Palestinian people have a right to a state.” In fact, it’s only a bit of an over-simplification to say, the right response ought to be literally what Palin’s was: That it’s not an issue for them and we ought to be talking about how to fix the economy — that is we ought to be focused on how you go from the indisputable right of the Palestinians to have their own state to working together to create one that is self-sustaining and can do a better job creating opportunities for the Palestinian people than neighboring states (other than Israel) have done for their citizens. That’s the critical challenge for both Israelis and Palestinians together.

Leave a Comment

Filed under foreign policy, independent internationalist, Israel, Israel/Palestine, sarah palin

Being A Woman and A Diplomat

http://video.ted.com/assets/player/swf/EmbedPlayer.swf

Leave a Comment

Filed under independent internationalist, state department

Morning Memo: Monday, February 21

Good Morning!

Too many protests…

Top Topics:

Libya Could Drift Into Civil War Because of Protests

The Obama Administration Wants Punishment For Libyan Protest Abusers

Protests Start In Morocco

Crackdown In China Over Democracy Protests Building

Merkel’s Party Defeated In Local Elections    

Israel Goes After Iran For Ships Going Through Suez Canal

Uganda’s President Elected For A Fourth Term

Government Shutdown Rhetoric Grows In U.S.

Wisconsin Union Protests Continue

Figures of Note:

sc4m7pvjukkddoc0k0aj6a.gif

What one country anywhere in the world do you consider to be the United States' greatest enemy today? February 2011

Opinions of Note:

Hossein Askari on Why Iran Is Different From Egypt

Michael B. Oren on Israel Reacting To Egypt

My First Thought: Israel, Israel, Israel

Israel has been the newest center of the universe when it comes to U.S. foreign policy.  Egypt’s new government forced the U.S. to reexamine its policy towards propping up regimes that keep a region stable, especially for the sake of keeping peace with one country.  Other Arab protests, some of which could reform towards true democracies, might challenge the U.S. policy towards Israel because it will not be the only “real” democracy in the Middle East to hold up as a model.  Yes, Iraq and Afghanistan were supposed to be the newest inspirations for the Arab world, but sadly the organic fashion of these protests prove that hypothesis to be false.

One of the reasons the U.S. protected Israel was because it was surrounded by a world of enemies that were not democracies.  This, in my mind, had the U.S. overlook some of the abuses that Israel committed in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip through settlement activity.  That was the main reason the U.N. Security Resolution that condemned Israel’s activity in the West Bank was vetoed by the U.S., to support this policy.  New allies could force the U.S. to have a paradigm shift in terms of policies towards Israel.  Maybe the U.S. will demand Israel give up more during the peace talks with the Palestinians.  What happens in the Middle East will definitely keep Israel as  a central theme in U.S. foreign policy, but now for slightly different reasons.

Photo Credit: Fox News

Figures from Gallup

Leave a Comment

Filed under independent internationalist, Morning Memo