Matt Lewis at the Daily Caller believes that think tanks (like Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute) play to a constituency:
If think tanks are like the rest of us, in that they must fill a niche, this seems to make sense. Heritage seems interested in moving from an academic brand to a more activist “grassroots” image. Meanwhile, one imagines there are tons of rich conservative/libertarian donors, living in places like New York City and Palm Beach
, who religiously read theWall Street Journal, and who might now be more comfortable donating to a think tank espousing Brooks’ immigration views than Heritage president Jim DeMint’s more populist views.
This is not to say these two think tanks have diverged for strategic purposes. Heritage has been advocating this anti-immigration reform position since at least 2007, and Arthur Brooks has long argued that immigration is the most entrepreneurial act in which a person could engage.
Thus, explaining why the Heritage Foundation opposes immigration reform and AEI is more open to it.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/16/aeis-arthur-brooks-gop-can-win-hispanic-voters/#ixzz2TT6ncnZQ
